CO2 GAS Suppliers

Click link below

Then bottom right 'Gas Agent'

BOC GASES AUS

 return to product info & pricing

Slayer verses Mosquito Magnet             Cairns Nth QLD

Mosquito Slayer (MS), Mosquito Magnet Pro (MM) and Centers for Disease Control light(CDC) in north Queensland.            Dr. Scott Richie PHD.

RESULTS

 All traps collected large numbers of mosquitoes and sandflies (Tables 1-2). The primary species collected (Ochlerotatus, Verrallina and Culex are major nuisance species and important vectors of Ross River virus and Japanese encephalitis (only Culex annulirostris and Cx. gelidus). TheCulicoides collected (primarily C. ornatus) are important nuisance species in N Queensland. The MosquitoSlayer + satellite unit resulted in higher collections of mosquitoes than either the Mosquito Magnet or the CDC trap. The MM consistently collected the highest number of sandflies.( however all machines had significant sandfly catches).The MS also collected large numbers of nontarget insects (Table 2). Either alone or with the satellite, nontarget insects represented about 50% of the total collection. Many of these insects were large moths or beetles, and even cicadas were occasionally collected. These insects were likely attracted to the lights on the front of the MS trap,( however the UV light can easily be removed from any trap to eradicate the collection of non-target insects if required...with often, very minimal effect regarding mosquito catches ) Collections of nontarget insects by the MMand the CDC traps were conversely very low (2.9% and 2.4%, respectively). This reflects the lack of light with the MM and only a small light (6 volt torch light partially blacked out with felt marker) on the CDC trap.

 

METHODS

All traps were run according to manufacturer's standard conditions, with 500 cc/min CO2 supplemented to the CDC light trap. The CDC light trap is the gold standard for routine mosquito collection in the USA. The MS was run with a supplementary satellite unit (main unit and satellite) fed from a common CO2 source. Thus, there were 3 different traps (MS + satellite, MM, andCDC) on a trap night. Traps were set 50 m apart and positions changed nightly so that each trap was located at each position once to correct for positional effects. Octenol was not employed with any trap.

Traps were set in a swampy area near Yorkeys Knob, ca. 15 km north of Cairns, from 21-24 Jan.2003. Mosquitoes were identified to species while other insects categorised by order. Because the screen on the collection bag was too large, no sandfly collections were made using the CDCtrap.

 

COMPARISON OF THE MOSQUITO SLAYER, MOSQUITO MAGNET PRO AND THE CDC

LIGHT TRAP IN NORTH QUEENSLAND

 

Scott A. Ritchie, PhD

 

On behalf on the Edward Koch Foundation

PO Box 2964

Cairns 4870

21 May 2003

 

Great Landscaping ideas

...Free Electrical power...

...Swimming Pool guide.

.Spa Maintenance guide.

DIY Solar & Wind Energy

Beautiful Clear Clean..

Tankwater "Amazing"    

 Proudly Australian made..

      "TANK PRO".........

.

    CLEAN WATER......

Mosquito Larvae free

It's easy to  waste money on Mosquito  traps that claim they create CO2 by Photocatalyst lamps....or even 'Zappers' that promise but never deliver. All such low cost units are frustratingly inadequate       

See 'How to deal with mosquitoes'  Video above!

SAFETY ALERT!

DON'T BUY
PROPANE TRAPS

HERE'S WHY

    Mosquito Diseases        

  Sandflies and midges      

10,000 Dead in 1 Night

Sandflies, Midges and

Mosquitoes

Slayer Ser.  outcatch's

all others

 

 

Website Design and Development by Web Peformance